Aggression Minimization Program Free Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the Aggression Minimization Program. Answer: Mental Health Rehabilitation Aggression Minimization Program (AMP) In order to address the needs of the patients with mental illness, they should be admitted and served at the mental rehabilitation centers. This has however been quite tasking because of the challenges such as violence and aggression. As a mental healthcare provider, I have been concerned about the prevalence of aggression and violence amongst the mental health patients (Canvin, Rugksa, Sinclair Burns, 2014). I know that the problem can be resolved if appropriate measures are taken. To be part of the solution, I have decided to launch a project called Aggression Minimization Program (AMP). AMP is a noble initiative whose aim is to reduce the cases of aggression and violence at the mental rehabilitation centers. I believe that the people with mental illness can be empowered to be violent and aggression-free persons especially during rehabilitation. To achieve this goal, I plan to roll out an education campaign in which I will organize how to sensitize the mentally-ill patients on var ious matters in relation to their mental conditions. I will strive to enlighten the patients on the dangers of aggression and violence and the most appropriate strategies to adopt to refrain from such so as to create a safe rehabilitation environment for themselves, their counterparts, and healthcare providers as well (Whiteford, et al., 2014). Questions raised to Colleagues regarding the Project What is the main objective of this project? What strategies should be used in measuring the objectives of the project? Identify and explain three strategies that can be applied to ultimately resolve the problem of aggression and violence at the rehabilitation facilities? Responses Colleagues Questions Response 1 Question: Is the time frame to produce these deliverables the measurable goals or the knowledge and confidence of the staff members receiving clinical handover or both? First and foremost, I would like to begin by commending for coming up with this brilliant idea. Actually clinical bedside handover is a very important process in nursing. It can help in providing safe and high quality healthcare services to the patient (Bradley Mott, 2014). However, based on this project, I would like to say that he deliverables should not be based on the duration used in producing the video tutorials. I suggest that the deliverables should be the staff members confidence and knowledge as well as the project goals. I argue in favor of the projects objectives because it is what matters. The aim of the project has nothing to do with time management. It is focused on educating the PARU staff members on how to properly manage clinical bedside handover so as to help in providing patient-centered and holist satisfactory healthcare services to the patient (Anderson, Malone, Shanahan Manning, 2015). Response 2 Question: Who do you feel would greatly benefit from this project and do you feel it would greatly improve patients recovery? This project will greatly benefit the ICU patients as well as their family members or carers. It will provide them with accurate information on the activities and occurrences experienced during their time in the ICU. As clearly illustrated in the project, ICU patients and family members always undergo through a difficult time that affects them psychologically and emotionally hence making them unable to know and remember what happens each day. This is the problem that will be resolved by the diary because it will record and update everything that happens during the time spent at the ICU. Having said this, I would also like to point out that the project will help in improving the recovery process. When the patients become aware of their status and the changes experienced since admission, the patient will learn to appreciate the services, develop a positive attitude, and have faith in the healthcare services rendered Response 3 Question: Does the deliverable meet the requirement criteria for a project and does it have real benefit and value? I would like to agree that the deliverable of the project meets the expected requirements criteria because it has everything that is needed in such a project. It is a properly planned and organized project that specifies all the activities, procedures, and objectives to be accomplished and how to do so (Barlow, 2011). In terms of benefits, I also support the project to be having good values and benefits to the community. It will be relied upon to improve the quality of management for Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs). At the same time, it will help in improving the competence of the nursing staff by providing them with adequate knowledge, psycho-motor skills, and confidence levels (Kidd, Kenny McKinstry, 2014). The project will achieve this by providing an objective and focused training on the management of patients. It should therefore be supported because it will play a significant role in reducing risks and improving the quality of service-delivery by the nursing staff. References Anderson, J., Malone, L., Shanahan, K., Manning, J., 2015, Nursing bedside clinical handoveran integrated review of issues and tools. Journal of clinical nursing, 24(5-6), 662-671. Barlow, D., 2011, The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. Bradley, S., Mott, S., 2014, Adopting a patient?centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals. Journal of clinical nursing, 23(13-14), 1927-1936. Canvin, K., Rugksa, J., Sinclair, J. Burns, T., 2014, Patient, psychiatrist and family carer experiences of community treatment orders: qualitative study. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 49(12), pp.1873-1882. Kidd, S., Kenny, A., McKinstry, C., 2014, From experience to action in recovery-oriented mental health practice: A first person inquiry. Action Research, 12(4), 357-373. Whiteford, H. A., et al., 2014, Estimating treatment rates for mental disorders in Australia. Australian Health Review, 38(1), 80-85.